(Warning: Obscure naughtiness forward. Additionally googly eyes.)
Sue M. had her Instagram account disabled for posting this cake:
Why?
Effectively, in keeping with Instagram:
“We disable accounts that put up content material that’s sexually suggestive or comprises nudity.”
Translation? They thought her cake was boobs.
Now, I might possibly perceive if Sue’s cake appeared like this:
Or this:
And even this:
And I would positively perceive if her cake appeared like this:
Which, as you possibly can see from John’s oh-so-helpful censoring job*, completely appears to be like like a bug-eyed Oompa Loompa on the seashore.
(Why sure, I DID solely embody this one to share that visible. YOU’RE WELCOME.)
After all we right here at Cake Wrecks aren’t any strangers to being banned from social networks for posting “suggestive” truffles, so enable me to supply the next recommendation:
Something vaguely nipplish or boobish will get you banned as a result of AMERICA, and we do not want that form of obscene obscenity on our interwebz, so simply steer clear.
….until in fact it is man boobs.
These are cool.
SO BRING ON THE MAN BEWBS!
Or, you already know, do not.
Significantly, you possibly can cease now.
AAAAAAND WE’RE DONE.
Because of Jenn A., Ambular B., Sarah M., Krista M., Jessica L., Ashley B., Lisa C., & Jen S., who is just not joyful to see us, and after that, who might blame her?
*Be aware from john: I am simply glad I used to be in a position to prevent all from seeing obscene obscenity. You are welcome.
*****
P.S. Whereas we’re speaking bewbs, this is a shout-out to my favourite wire-free bra:
Warner’s Simple Does It Seamless Wi-fi Bra
I really like the under-arm smoothing panel – no dig or pinch! – and like most Warners, these are extremely comfy. These are all I put on now! I watch the itemizing and purchase any shade that goes beneath $20, and proper now there are 7 colours on sale for $17.99. Go see!
Oh, and make sure to test the picture gallery for a greater thought of how these look on bigger tracts of land.